Smart Food Safe

Notification Bar
Smart Food Safe is participating in the 14th American Food Sure Summit February 24–25, 2026, at the Loews Atlanta Hotel, 1065 Peachtree Rd NE, Atlanta. Meet us there!

Audit Management Software

Significance of Efficient Gap Analysis for Successful Audit Management

May 11, 2023

Audit Management Software

Significance of Efficient Gap Analysis for Successful Audit Management

May 11, 2023

Smart HACCP Table of Contents
Help Icon

Did you know that conducting a thorough gap assessment is an adequate way for food businesses to improve their chances of achieving a favorable audit result?

Gap assessment or gap analysis is a process that can help food industries identify and resolve potential quality and food safety gaps, thereby ensuring that their current way of operations meets the appropriate requirements. It is often one of the first steps for a food enterprise to implement a Food Safety Management System (FSMS).

An Overview of Gap Assessment in the Food Industry

In the food sector, gap assessment enables food industries to review their food safety and quality management systems by evaluating the present protocols and routine processes. It acts as the foundation to determine if any deficiencies or non-compliances exist and what enhancements must be made to eliminate them.

Gap assessment is usually performed in food industries to evaluate readiness for external audits such as Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI), which provides assurance that a food company’s food safety management system works in compliance with internationally-recognized regulations and standards. Gap audits can be carried out internally in a food company or externally with a third-party gap assessment  offered by certification organizations or by an independent food safety consultant to be done before running actual audits.

In conclusion, executing gap assessments in food industries is advantageous in establishing a starting point as part of the long-term plan for evolving their food safety and quality management programs (FSMP) by detecting the lacking elements and focusing on them before they become disastrous issues while also aiding in mitigating food safety risks and hazards, protecting public health, and securing compliance requirements.

Steps Involved in Performing a Gap Assessment

There is no single set of instructions for carrying out a gap assessment covering all food industry segments. Anyhow, every gap analysis will involve defining the requirements that need to be met, benchmarking the overall processes and practices, locating areas for progress to bring compliance, and drafting a written report on where to take action. Following is a guide on how to perform gap analysis in the food industry.

  1. Identify the standard or regulation: Identify the standard or regulation that applies to the food business, which could be GFSI-approved standards such as British Retail Consortium Global Standards (BRCGS) or Safe Quality Food Institute (SQFI) standards, or national or local regulations such as FDA Food Code.
  2. Develop an audit checklist: A vital tool for gap analysis is an audit checklist that enlists the prerequisites of the standard in the format of questions, using which the auditor compares the current system against the standard requirements.
  3. Conduct the assessment against the standard requirements and evaluate the gaps: Perform the gap analysis by comparing the compiled information with the developed audit checklist. Pinpoint any areas where the business’s food safety practices do not meet the standard requirements or regulations.
  4. Specify and prioritize the determined gaps: All identified gaps are documented on a draft assessment report and delivered to the food safety management team. Prioritize the gaps based on their level of risk and potential impact on food safety to ascertain that any high-risk issues are addressed immediately.
  5. Devise an action plan: Develop an action plan to manage the identified gaps by implementing actions to be taken, timelines, responsibilities, and resources needed.
  6. Enforce the action plan: Carry out the action plan and monitor progress to ensure the gaps are handled.
  7. Review and update: Review and update the gap assessment periodically to ensure that the food safety management system remains effective and compliant with the respective standard or regulation.

How Does Gap Assessment Help With Audit Management?

“Success is where preparation and opportunity meet” is a quote that highlights the importance of being prepared to seize opportunities. Similarly, in the context of audits, proper preparation through gap assessments can be instrumental in managing audits to yield successful audit results. Let’s have a look at how gap assessment can help with audit management.

Firstly, they provide an organization with early warnings of possible issues before the audit takes place so that they can remediate them, reducing the likelihood of non-compliance and potential penalties.

Secondly, a gap assessment can assist in complying with the requirements of an audit standard, which is particularly beneficial when the business is new to a specific audit standard or has recently undergone significant changes in its operations.

Thirdly, the business can concentrate its resources and prioritize efforts on the areas or gaps grasped from a thorough gap assessment process that are most critical to attaining compliance.

Finally, when enterprises take the initiative to attend to non-conformances in advance of audits, it demonstrates their commitment to adhering to their audit standard and that they are willing to take the essential steps which help build trust with auditors.

Therefore, employing efficient gap assessment is the quick route for firms to comprehend how efficient their processes are today versus how optimized they need to be in the future, depending on which they can modify or revise their approaches for continuous improvement and stay audit ready.

Challenges Faced in Audit Management Systems

Conventionally, audits are carried out using paper-based audit management systems. Several challenges are associated with this approach as they involve manual processes for documenting, tracking, and reporting on audit activities. Major challenges faced in the current audit management scenario include:

  • Paper-based Tool: Audits on paper present challenges, such as time-consuming data entry, difficulty in sharing information among team members, higher risk of errors and inconsistencies, limited ability to access and analyze audit data in real-time, and environmental impact due to the enormous quantity of paper records required. Additionally, paper-based systems can be cumbersome to maintain and may not be scalable as organizations grow and expand their operations.
  • Scheduling: Traditional audit management does not support audit scheduling ability, making it difficult for auditors to plan and supervise audits efficiently. Auditors may struggle to coordinate with stakeholders and ensure that audits are executed on time, leading to delays in audit completion, missed deadlines, and an increased risk of non-compliance.
  • Capturing Objective Evidence: Auditors generally gather objective evidence by observing processes, interviewing staff, and reading documents. There is a lack of appropriate tools to obtain objective evidence for a non-conformity identified during audits, making it tedious to document instances of non-compliances correctly. Auditors may have trouble explaining their findings and recommending corrective actions without proper documentation.
  • Non-Compliance Management: The process of non-compliance management in paper-based audits usually comprises manual audit data compilation for determining non-compliances, investigating incidents, root cause analysis, performing corrective actions, and verification and closure of the corrective actions. It tends to affect the overall efficiency of handling the non-compliances as it would take more time and effort to precisely identify non-compliances, trace back the root causes, and take preventive and corrective actions quickly to minimize the risk of recurrence.
  • Trend Analysis: Existing audit management systems often do not accommodate trend analysis features as there is no provision for real-time reporting and analytics capabilities. Trend analysis in audit management can help recognize patterns and trends in audit data over time, provide insights into the root causes of non-compliance, allow the detection of risk areas, and formulate preventive actions to avoid future non-compliance. It is also substantial for pinpointing areas where additional training or resources may be required, enabling organizations to proactively manage potential non-compliance issues.

Transformation of Audit Models

The prevalence of current challenges in audit management systems has brought forth a transformation of audit models involving a shift from traditional paper-based audit management to digital audit management systems. An  audit management software simplifies the scheduling of audits by providing automated tracking and reporting features. With a centralized platform for storing audit schedules and tasks, auditors can manage their workloads more efficiently, reducing the risk of errors and delays. The software also provides reminders and notifications, ensuring that audits are conducted on time.

Digital audit management makes it easier to capture objective evidence by allowing auditors to document evidence directly in the system. This reduces the risk of errors and inaccuracies, and the evidence is readily available for review and analysis by other stakeholders.

Non-compliance management is more efficient with digital systems, providing tools for investigation, root cause analysis, and corrective action management. With a centralized platform for managing non-compliances, auditors can track and monitor non-compliances in real time, reducing the risk of any non-compliance going unresolved.

Finally, trend analysis is streamlined with digital systems, providing real-time reporting and analytics capabilities to identify patterns and trends quickly.

Overall, the transition from paper-based to digital audit management systems offers several benefits, including increased efficiency, reduced risk, and improved compliance. The adoption of audit management software has revolutionized the audit process, providing the relevant tools they need to manage their workloads more efficiently and effectively.

Smart Audit as an Important Tool to Achieve Audit Compliance

SmartFoodSafe’s Smart Audit is a vital compliance tool for achieving audit compliance across various industries. Leveraging technology, this audit management tool automates and centralizes auditing processes, ensuring accuracy, efficiency, and real-time data analysis. Smart Audit enables businesses to identify gaps, implement corrective actions promptly, and maintain regulatory compliance effectively, driving operational excellence and risk mitigation.

A gap analysis in an audit serves multiple purposes, including:
1. Identifying discrepancies
2. Prioritizing improvements
3. Developing action plans
4. Enhancing performance and compliance

Gap analysis is a systematic process that compares the current state with the desired state, identifying discrepancies and areas for improvement. It helps prioritize efforts, develop action plans, and bridge the gaps to achieve desired objectives.

The purpose of a gap analysis in an audit is to identify discrepancies between the current state and desired objectives, enabling prioritization of improvements and action plans to bridge the gaps and enhance performance and compliance

Gap analysis in audits can be conducted using various standards, such as ISO standards (e.g., ISO 9001 for quality management), industry-specific regulations, internal policies, or best practices. The specific standard depends on the nature of the audit and the desired objectives or compliance requirements.

Internal audit evaluates the effectiveness of internal controls, risk management, and compliance with policies. Gap assessment identifies discrepancies between current state and desired objectives or standards. Internal audit focuses on overall organizational performance, while gap assessment specifically targets identified gaps for improvement.

Quality and Food Safety Management Software

Food Safety and Quality Management Software to streamline processes, track compliance, ensure traceability and maintain audit readiness with global quality and food safety standards

Quality and Food Safety Management Software

Food Safety and Quality Management Software to streamline processes, track compliance, ensure traceability and maintain audit readiness with global quality and food safety standards
1